|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003859450 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616170613.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
770827s1977 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED147715 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED147715 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Blumenthal, Pat.
|
| 245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A Faculty Self-Study Group Approach to Improving Instruction Quality /
|c Pat Blumenthal.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1977.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 7 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (San Francisco, California, August 26-30, 1977).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This faculty project development had three main objectives: (1) to enable faculty to observe and evaluate their own behavior in the classroom; (2) to provide each faculty member with feedback from peers in a non-evaluative setting; and (3) to allow faculty to observe other teachers in action, to learn alternative teaching styles and to discuss their impact on students. The group was composed primarily of junior faculty in psychology. Each week, one member presented a videotape made in his classroom. The group's attention was focused on both verbal and non-verbal behaviors. The approach to evaluation was informal. Principles of role modeling, feedback, and group process were utilized. All group members felt that their participation had been beneficial, and that stated objectives had been met. In follow-up interviews, participants reported that they had: (1) developed a repertoire of alternative teaching methods; (2) implemented changes in teaching behavior; (3) continued using videotape for self-evaluation; and (4) engaged in more discussion about teaching with peers, and encouraged informal classroom visitation. The Self-Study Group appears to be a valuable model for faculty development, whereby psychology teachers can utilize their own resources for improvement without additional institutional support. (Author/JLL)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a College Faculty.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Feedback.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Group Dynamics.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Higher Education.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Microteaching.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Modeling (Psychology)
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Professional Continuing Education.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Program Descriptions.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Self Help Programs.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Teacher Effectiveness.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Teaching Methods.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Videotape Recordings.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Self Study Groups
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b6034359x
|b 211122
|c 081210
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081210
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 2
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i d9736639-f5e6-5db4-8979-b1967941fd85
|s eb12df82-8216-52d9-9f12-a2e71126724f
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED147715 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
