Legal Theory in Support of Bilingual Education / Raymond A. Nava Santana.

A review of the national and state legislation dealing with bilingual education is presented in the context of an introductory history of the bilingual movement in the United States. This history falls into two periods; the first from 1840-1920, and the second from 1960 to the present. The goal of b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santana, Raymond A. Nava
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1982.
Subjects:
Genre:
Physical Description:39 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 in00003933282
003 ERIC
005 20220616015052.0
007 he u||024||||
008 820101s1982 xx ||| b ||| s eng d
035 |a ED224290 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
099 |a ED224290 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Santana, Raymond A. Nava. 
245 1 0 |a Legal Theory in Support of Bilingual Education /  |c Raymond A. Nava Santana. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1982. 
300 |a 39 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, NY, March 22, 1982).  |5 ericd 
520 |a A review of the national and state legislation dealing with bilingual education is presented in the context of an introductory history of the bilingual movement in the United States. This history falls into two periods; the first from 1840-1920, and the second from 1960 to the present. The goal of bilingual education, to teach English without sacrificing the home language and culture, is the backdrop for the examination of the laws governing it. First, federal bilingual policy mechanisms are examined from the initial constitutional mandate resulting from the Brown v. Board of Education case to action of the Reagan administration in 1981 withdrawing proposed Lau regulations. In each case the legislation is criticized in terms of its impact on equal educational opportunity for limited English speaking minority children. Following this section, the response of the Los Angeles Unified School District to the 1974 Supreme Court decision in the Lau case is presented and an outline of major deficiencies existing in Los Angeles as of 1980 are discussed. A fourth section describes California's bilingual/bicultural education program and the policy mechanisms that support it. The final section is a review of court actions in Los Angeles and Judge Egly's orders in 1980 on proposed programs for segregated and racially isolated minority schools. (AMH) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 1 7 |a Bilingual Education.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Civil Rights.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Educational Policy.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Federal Legislation.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Limited English Speaking.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Minority Groups.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Social Discrimination.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a State Legislation.  |2 ericd 
653 0 |a Brown v Board of Education  |a Lau v Nichols 
655 7 |a Speeches/Meeting Papers.  |2 ericd 
655 7 |a Reports, Descriptive.  |2 ericd 
655 7 |a Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials.  |2 ericd 
907 |y .b61331788  |b 211122  |c 081212 
998 |a mc  |b 081212  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i 89f1bccf-d583-556d-8ec5-ad95417cc84e  |s 53c3408d-4b37-5d0e-b6ec-ba5b2df935cd  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED224290 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1