|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003935323 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616015255.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
821001s1982 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED226391 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED226391 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Selnow, Gary W.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82064114
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sex Differences in Reported Profanity Uses and Perceptions /
|c Gary W. Selnow.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1982.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 15 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Communication, Language, and Gender Conference (5th, Athens, OH, October 15-16, 1982).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a A study examined sex differences in the usage and perceptions of profanity. Subjects, 135 undergraduate students (61 females and 74 males), completed a questionnaire requesting information about demographics, attitudes, and use of profanity. The initial series of questions sought to obtain a self-reported estimate of the frequency with which respondents used profanity in daily speech. Female respondents reported significantly less frequent use of profanity than did males. In all but a single instance (use of profanity in mixed company) female respondents said they felt the use of profanity would be less appropriate than males said it would be. Male respondents were more inclined than females to report that profanity provided a linguistic tool with which to demonstrate the social power of the speaker, and they were also more likely than females to report that profanity helped make the user socially acceptable. When asked to rate 16 commonly used terms on a six-point scale, males and females surprisingly rated the words similarly, except for religious profanity, in which the ratings provided by males were more severe than those given by females. (HTH)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a College Students.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Females.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Higher Education.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Interpersonal Communication.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Language Attitudes.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Language Research.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Language Usage.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Males.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Sex Differences.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Sociolinguistics.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Student Attitudes.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Profanity
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b61352196
|b 211122
|c 081212
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081212
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 7f2df9f3-5ce0-5b80-b6cf-4b044057b082
|s 34ec772e-6ab7-586b-9464-c3d794003975
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED226391 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
