Evaluation of Elementary and Secondary School Principals / Kathy Weiss.

The focus of this study is the relationship between superintendents and principals and their collaborative approach to improving administrative performance. The research for this study was conducted in two phases. During the first phase, the Performance Rating Scale, which assesses the administrativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Weiss, Kathy
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1989.
Subjects:
Genre:
Physical Description:11 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 in00004011423
003 ERIC
005 20220616030625.0
007 he u||024||||
008 890301s1989 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d
035 |a ED303904 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
099 |a ED303904 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Weiss, Kathy.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2010045582 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation of Elementary and Secondary School Principals /  |c Kathy Weiss. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1989. 
300 |a 11 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators (Orlando, FL, March 3-6, 1989).  |5 ericd 
520 |a The focus of this study is the relationship between superintendents and principals and their collaborative approach to improving administrative performance. The research for this study was conducted in two phases. During the first phase, the Performance Rating Scale, which assesses the administrative performance of the school principal, was developed. Five general categories of competency emerged and were used as a basis for the analysis of the data: leadership, educational, interpersonal, managerial, and professional. The second phase of the study consisted of the development, implementation, and assessment of an evaluative process. The process utilized the instrument developed in phase 1 to establish goals and objectives that were cooperatively determined by the superintendent and the principal. A Likert-scale questionnaire was completed by each principal and superintendent. The results were related to strength/weakness identification, the planning conference, the work plan, interim and summative conferences, and the overall process. (SI) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 0 7 |a Administrator Effectiveness.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Administrator Evaluation.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Research.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Leadership.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Likert Scales.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Principals.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a School Administration.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Superintendents.  |2 ericd 
653 1 |a Performance Rating Scale 
655 7 |a Reports, Evaluative.  |2 ericd 
655 7 |a Speeches/Meeting Papers.  |2 ericd 
907 |y .b62457317  |b 211123  |c 081215 
998 |a mc  |b 081215  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i 64793674-af4c-59a9-96c6-4cada65b82cd  |s 50543b08-4a9b-5348-a373-cab6e9158de4  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED303904 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1