|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00004014742 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616030935.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
890301s1989 xx ||| b ||| s eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED307308 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED307308 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Davis, Alan.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79009808
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Chapter 1 Self-Assessment Instrument :
|b Internal Consistency of a Program Improvement Tool /
|c Alan Davis and Shelley H. Billig.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1989.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 21 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, March 27-31, 1989).
|5 ericd
|
520 |
|
|
|a The internal consistency of the Self Assessment Instrument of Chapter 1 Program Quality (SAICPQ) was studied. This instrument is widely used to assess the implementation of exemplary practices in compensatory education. The SAICPQ is a self-report questionnaire consisting of 13 subscales representing correlates of achievement in studies of effective schools and classrooms. Out of a total of 201 educators familiar with Chapter 1 in 40 school districts in four states, 167 educators returned completed self-assessment instruments. The reliability of the total instrument and each subscale was computed. Further analysis then suggested rough ranking of the subscales by the degree of construct integrity. Exploratory factor analyses then further described the relationship of items to subscales. All but two subscales had reliabilities above 0.80, indicating generally strong internal consistency. Analysis suggested that subscales E (staff development) and G (leadership) may be reliable measures of distinct constructs and in little need of revision, but that subscales A (climate) and M (excellence rewarded) did not appear to measure distinct constructs. Exploratory factor analysis also provided moderate evidence of support for the overall construct integrity of the self-assessment instrument. Modifications to improve the internal consistency of the instrument are discussed. Four tables and one graph present study data. The SAICPQ is appended. (SLD)
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Compensatory Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Construct Validity.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Demonstration Programs.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Educational Quality.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Elementary Secondary Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Factor Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Program Evaluation.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Program Improvement.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a School Effectiveness.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a School Surveys.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Self Evaluation (Groups)
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Test Reliability.
|2 ericd
|
653 |
1 |
|
|a Internal Consistency
|a Self Assessment Instrument Chapter 1 Prog Quality
|
653 |
0 |
|
|a Education Consolidation Improvement Act Chapter 1
|a Exploratory Factor Analysis
|a Self Report Measures
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Tests/Questionnaires.
|2 ericd
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Billig, Shelley,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n97079809
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b62490515
|b 211123
|c 081215
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081215
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 4
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i 94a02f67-5786-5692-8ca8-da8d86214b0e
|s 5d589041-52ac-5d7b-835c-0fa2c50255e4
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED307308 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|