|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00004079490 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616041242.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
940201s1994 xx ||| b ||| s eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED371406 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED371406 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Aleman, Carlos G.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Protocol Analysis as a Method for Analyzing Conversational Data /
|c Carlos G. Aleman and Anita L. Vangelisti.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1994.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 18 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western States Communication Association (San Jose, CA, February 23-27, 1994).
|5 ericd
|
520 |
|
|
|a Protocol analysis, a technique that uses people's verbal reports about their cognitions as they engage in an assigned task, has been used in a number of applications to provide insight into how people mentally plan, assess, and carry out those assignments. Using a system of networked computers where actors communicate with each other over terminals and simultaneously talk aloud their thoughts, researchers can gain insight into people's cognitions during conversations. Participants converse over a computer-mediated channel, while simultaneously providing verbal protocols about their thoughts. It takes participants at least two conversational sessions before they begin to feel comfortable using and interacting on a mediated system. Examples from protocol data and past research illustrate how plans, evaluation, attributions, and shared experiences are activated during conversations. Advantages of the design are: it offers a new sort of data; data collection is easy once conversationalists are acquainted with the system; and there is much potential for investigating questions about cognition and/or interaction. Limitations include: the extent to which verbal protocols reflect cognition specific to the conversation; the sheer amount of time and effort to transcribe the videotapes; and questions regarding participants' varying ability to provide oral protocols. Analysis of protocol concurrent to conversation through a computer-mediated channel offers a unique opportunity to map cognition during interaction. (Contains 11 references.) (RS)
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Cognitive Processes.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Communication Research.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Higher Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Methods Research.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Protocol Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
653 |
1 |
|
|a Communication Behavior
|
653 |
0 |
|
|a Computer Mediated Communication
|a Conversation
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Descriptive.
|2 ericd
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Vangelisti, Anita L.,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n88202383
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b63469522
|b 211123
|c 081219
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081219
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i 43fa0733-6697-5ed7-85a8-0698eb915855
|s 826e44cf-5cd2-502f-a705-383429962583
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED371406 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|