Improving the Student Teaching Experience Through Selective Placement of Students / Larry L. Leslie.

A study was conducted to determine whether matching of student teacher and cooperating teacher would produce improved student teacher performance and attitude. Ninety student teachers were randomly assigned to five treatment groups: a control group and four experimental groups differing in the exten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leslie, Larry L.
Corporate Author: Utah Univ., Salt Lake City
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1969.
Subjects:
Physical Description:85 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 in00003762269
003 ERIC
005 20220616152629.0
007 he u||024||||
008 690801s1969 xx ||| b ||| | eng d
035 |a ED034718 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
099 |a ED034718 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Leslie, Larry L.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86046188 
245 1 0 |a Improving the Student Teaching Experience Through Selective Placement of Students /  |c Larry L. Leslie. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1969. 
300 |a 85 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. Bureau of Research.  |5 ericd 
500 |a Contract Number: OEG-8-9-540015-2019(058).  |5 ericd 
520 |a A study was conducted to determine whether matching of student teacher and cooperating teacher would produce improved student teacher performance and attitude. Ninety student teachers were randomly assigned to five treatment groups: a control group and four experimental groups differing in the extent to which students were matched to cooperating teachers on the basis of demographic and/or personality variables such as socioeconomic status, rural-urban background, religion, security, autonomy, innovativeness. Demographic and personality data was collected from a variety of sources including files, questionnaires, Q-sort, and interviews. Performance and attitude measures included attitude inventory pre- and posttests, student and teacher questionnaires and interviews, supervisor and cooperating teacher evaluations, and time budget analysis interviews and interaction analysis observations conducted three times at equal intervals for a sample of 10 randomly selected students from each group. Data analysis included various statistical tests for verification of controls, determination of predictor variables, and analysis of differences among the five groups. Major findings: The methods of matching used, as a composite, did not produce results superior to traditional student assignment; within-group comparisons appear to demonstrate the theoretical advantages of matching in general. Full findings and data-gathering instruments are included. [Not available in hard copy due to marginal legibility of original document.] (JS) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 1 7 |a Cooperating Teachers.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Demography.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Interpersonal Relationship.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Personality.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Practicum Supervision.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Student Teachers.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Student Teaching.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Behavior.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Placement.  |2 ericd 
710 2 |a Utah Univ., Salt Lake City. 
907 |y .b59184760  |b 211122  |c 081208 
998 |a mc  |b 081208  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i 13cdf3bc-86f9-5f4a-b214-1c46f89276ae  |s 9ee0248d-60eb-5cd6-86c1-402b29f71720  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED034718 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1