A Community Power Structure : A Methodological Analysis and Comparison / C. William Given and John B. Mitchell.

This study attempts to analyze and compare the structure of influence in two rural communities in southern Ohio with population centers of less than 10,000 inhabitants. (For a study of one of the communities only, see AC 010 451.) The two communities are studied as to reputed influentials, the busin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Given, C. William
Mitchell, John B. (Author)
Corporate Author: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1971.
Subjects:
Physical Description:20 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 in00003776495
003 ERIC
005 20220616154104.0
007 he u||024||||
008 710601s1971 xx ||| b ||| | eng d
035 |a ED052425 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
088 |a R-Bull-1046 
099 |a ED052425 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Given, C. William.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n88668883 
245 1 2 |a A Community Power Structure :  |b A Methodological Analysis and Comparison /  |c C. William Given and John B. Mitchell. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1971. 
300 |a 20 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a ERIC Note: Part of Hatch Project 304 "A Study of the Decision-Making Process in Small Communities".  |5 ericd 
520 |a This study attempts to analyze and compare the structure of influence in two rural communities in southern Ohio with population centers of less than 10,000 inhabitants. (For a study of one of the communities only, see AC 010 451.) The two communities are studied as to reputed influentials, the business and economic subsystem, the civic organizational subsystem, the educational subsystem, and the governmental subsystem. A comparison of the two communities as to influence structure revealed both similarities and differences. One community, Riverview (a pseudonym) had a structure of influence directed by community influentials; in the other community, Newton (a pseudonym), the reputed community influentials, with one exception, seemed neither to be the source of influence nor closely allied to influential units of the community. Conclusions are that: (1) the reputational technique makes it difficult to locate and identify socially and geographically removed individuals, emerging influentials, and influentials no longer active in community decision making; (2) the social system as a conceptual tool is useful as a theoretical framework from which to analyze the structure of influence; (3) the vertical system concept is a useful tool in analyzing extra-community based influence; and (4) the two communities exhibit characteristics similar to larger ones. (DB) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 1 7 |a Community Leaders.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Power Structure.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Rural Areas.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Social Systems.  |2 ericd 
653 0 |a Hatch Project 304 
700 1 |a Mitchell, John B.,  |e author. 
710 2 |a Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster. 
907 |y .b59327030  |b 211122  |c 081208 
998 |a mc  |b 081208  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 2  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i b0a50a31-90a1-52f6-9665-726d2410ae1c  |s 6c263336-a456-53cf-a39a-10a052961420  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED052425 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1