|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00003780686 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616154538.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
711101s1971 xx ||| b ||| | eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED056993 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED056993 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a English, Fenwick W.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50012281
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluating the Effects of Implementing a Differentiated Teaching Staff :
|b Problems and Issues. A Tentative Position Paper for Use in Project Evaluation /
|c Fenwick W. English and Others.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1971.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 20 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Educational level discussed: Junior High Schools.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Since the inception of the Arizona-Mesa Differentiated Staffing Project in June 1970, the project staff was charged with the responsibility of evaluating the effects of the changes brought about as a result of implementation in three pilot schools. It was found that experimental-design research in an ongoing social system was extremely difficult because of inability to control internal and external variables. After reviewing various methods used to evaluate social innovations, the staff decided on a combination of the case-study technique advocated by Weiss and Rein and the quasi-experimental design advocated by Campbell. Factors jeopardizing internal and external validity were identified and tentative research designs were outlined for five questions. The questions involved comparing project and non-project schools in relation to student achievement, school climate, staff attitudes, teacher ability to perform tasks specified in the original proposal, and degree of actual staff differentiation. Each research design specifies a hypothesis, data-gathering instruments, dependent and independent variables, and statistical treatment. (RT)
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Differentiated Staffs.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Elementary Schools.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Evaluation Methods.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Junior High Schools.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Pilot Projects.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Program Evaluation.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Research Design.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a School Personnel.
|2 ericd
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Mesa Public Schools, AZ.
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b59415307
|b 211122
|c 081208
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081208
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i 2329a0d9-3fe1-54d0-8c35-c943e43810ce
|s c034f483-dd13-5c43-a341-0afdba9c359e
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED056993 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|