The Ph.D. Production Function : The Case at Berkeley / David W. Breneman.

This report analyzes departmental variations in time to degree and attrition in Ph.D. programs at Berkeley. An alternative hypothesis, the Ph.D. production function, is examined by cross-section econometric analysis of 28 departments. The inputs included in the production function were student varia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Breneman, David W.
Corporate Author: University of California, Berkeley. Ford Foundation Program for Research in Univ. Administration
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1970.
Subjects:
Physical Description:63 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 in00003801046
003 ERIC
005 20220616160657.0
007 he u||024||||
008 701201s1970 xx ||| b ||| | eng d
035 |a ED081377 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
088 |a Pap-P-16 
099 |a ED081377 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Breneman, David W.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n81107913 
245 1 4 |a The Ph.D. Production Function :  |b The Case at Berkeley /  |c David W. Breneman. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1970. 
300 |a 63 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Availability: Ford Foundation, 2288 Fulton Street, Berkeley, California 94720.  |5 ericd 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Ford Foundation, New York, NY.  |5 ericd 
520 |a This report analyzes departmental variations in time to degree and attrition in Ph.D. programs at Berkeley. An alternative hypothesis, the Ph.D. production function, is examined by cross-section econometric analysis of 28 departments. The inputs included in the production function were student variables--quality and percent males; faculty variables--quality and number; and stipend support variables--number of T.A.'s, R.A.'s and fellowships. Estimates are given for the relative importance of each variable in explaining length of time to degree and attrition. The author argues that fellowships and research assistantships reflect the external market demand for Ph.D.'s, while teaching assistantships reflect the university's internal demand for instructional support. The production function and behavioral hypotheses are integrated by relating departmental differences in resources to an index of excess demand for Ph.D.'s by field. The author suggests that the production function hypothesis may be misleading, for increased resources unaccompanied by increased market demand may not lead to increased Ph.D. production. The paper concludes with an examination of the national production of new Ph.D.'s during the period 1947-1948 to 1967-68, focusing on Berkeley's relation to total supply. (Author) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 1 7 |a Degrees (Academic)  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Doctoral Degrees.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Dropout Rate.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Graduate Study.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Program Length.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Time to Degree.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Withdrawal (Education)  |2 ericd 
653 1 |a University of California Berkeley 
710 2 |a University of California, Berkeley. Ford Foundation Program for Research in Univ. Administration. 
907 |y .b59671348  |b 211122  |c 081209 
998 |a mc  |b 081209  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i e1a01a1e-128e-50eb-b904-b0a37ea70e2c  |s b438044b-d19b-5d24-a404-b27c2100b44a  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED081377 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1