|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003831885 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616163833.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
751001s1975 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED117199 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 088 |
|
|
|a ERIC-TM-46
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED117199 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Sherman, Thomas M.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n77014768
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Formative Student Evaluation of Instruction. TM Report 46 /
|c Thomas M. Sherman.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, DC :
|b ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation,
|c 1975.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 15 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Availability: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J. 08540 (free while supplies last).
|5 ericd
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC.
|5 ericd
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Contract Number: NIE-C-400-75-0015.
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Current practices and controversial issues pertaining to student evaluation of instruction are briefly reviewed and followed by a discussion of the application of formative evaluation to this endeavor. Two reasons are generally given for conducting teacher evaluations by students: identification of good teachers and instructional improvement. Summative evaluation appears to provide the identification but does not appear to improve instruction. The use of summative evaluation alone ignores the dynamic and process characteristics of teaching and makes teaching seem to be a static product which is unchanging and unidimensional. A formative approach appears best suited to provide information on improving instruction and should meet these three criteria: (1) it should be specific to a lesson, objective, or teaching behavior; (2) it should be conducted frequently; and (3) it should yield information which may foster the improvement of instruction during the teaching process. Such evaluation must be an integral part of the teaching process. In this way a closed feedback loop is created wherein information may be continually recycled. Formative evaluation should be embedded in a series of comprehensive and systematic procedures designed to evaluate instructional quality. Using formative evaluation by students effectively and in concert with other forms and sources of information should help teachers answer many questions about their teaching effectiveness and ultimately result in teaching improvement. (RC)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Elementary Secondary Education.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Feedback.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Formative Evaluation.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Teacher Effectiveness.
|2 ericd
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no96030867
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b60027393
|b 211122
|c 081209
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081209
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 13e9aa36-6afc-5e5b-a56c-bbdb887c9ad8
|s 38222dee-df7c-5f8b-be88-c03d47596227
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED117199 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
