|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003864884 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616171131.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
771201s1977 xx ||| b ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED153223 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED153223 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Nichols, John E.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84092820
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Tinker Case and Its Interpretation. Journalism Monographs No. 52 /
|c John E. Nichols.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1977.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 43 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Availability: Prof. Harold Wilson, AEJ Publications Manager, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 ($2.50).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In 1969, in the case of Tinker vs. the Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Supreme Court ruled that if student speech acts did not interfere, or threaten to interfere, with the operation of the school, the acts could not be banned. This study is an analysis of the Tinker decision and of the ways it has been applied to court cases involving the high school and college student press. The first section discusses the facts in the Tinker case, lower court decisions regarding it, the arguments before the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's decision, and the theory behind the case. The second section discusses court cases since the Tinker decision that have involved student press rights and have dealt with the following questions left vague or unanswered by the Tinker decision: What is "material and substantial interference" with school activities? When do forecasts of interference justify sanctions? Does the Tinker decision authorize prior restraint? Does the decision justify restraint, or only punishment? and, Must officials try to quell those who disturb the peace in reaction to expression before regulating the expressors? (GW)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Civil Liberties.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Court Litigation.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Freedom of Speech.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a High Schools.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Higher Education.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a School Newspapers.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Student Publications.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Student Rights.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Supreme Court Litigation.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Tinker v Des Moines Independent School District
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Journal Articles.
|2 ericd
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Association for Education in Journalism.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82001875
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b60451907
|b 211122
|c 081210
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081210
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 4
|i 2
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 1a549874-94bf-53f4-95a5-06207e37323e
|s 6c8b9955-f4de-58df-9d75-b0bdbbb51496
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED153223 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
