|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003874102 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616172030.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
780328s1978 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED163035 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED163035 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hymel, Glenn M.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2006024574
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Emrick's Model as a Basis for Determining an Optimal Criterion Score and a Ratio of Regret in a Mastery Testing Situation /
|c Glenn M. Hymel and W. George Gaines.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1978.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 15 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, March 28, 1978).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The evaluation model for mastery testing as proposed by Emrick (1971) represents an empirical approach to determining the most appropriate mastery criterion score that should be established in those testing situations which entail decision making relative to the continued progression or possible recycling of students in a given learning sequence. It is suggested in Emrick's model that practitioners and researchers alike are no longer limited to intuitive appeal or field-related precedents as a basis for establishing appropriate mastery score standards. Though not explicitly stated by Emrick, his model can be algebraically rewritten and its facility logically extended to accommodate those situations in which an ex post facto investigation is desired so as to determine the relative cost of decision errors associated with a previously administered mastery test which specified a given criterion score. (Author)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Cost Effectiveness.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Criterion Referenced Tests.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Cutting Scores.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Item Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Mastery Tests.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Mathematical Models.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Test Reliability.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Emrick (John A)
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Gaines, W. George,
|e author.
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b60544090
|b 211122
|c 081210
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081210
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i a065d8a1-119c-5611-a721-03d0740c51df
|s 002eba42-bbe2-55bd-accb-82580f4db13b
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED163035 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
