|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003895201 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616174240.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
790201s1979 xx ||| b ||| s eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED185111 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED185111 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Garcia-Quintana, Roan A.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78045596
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a What Does It Mean for Items to Fit a Latent Trait Psychometric Model :
|b A Comparison of Model Fitting with Content Validation /
|c Roan A. Garcia-Quintana and Joseph P. Ryan.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1979.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 14 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association (Kiawah Island, SC, February 20-24, 1979).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a A sixth-grade mathematics test was evaluated in two different ways, and the evaluations were compared. One method of evaluation was to use the Rasch model for item analysis and to accept or reject items on the basis of the extent to which the data fit the model. The other method of evaluation was to ask school superintendents and teachers to rate the items and objectives in terms of their appropriateness for the students and the curriculum. The Rasch model item analysis rejected fifteen of the forty test items and a factor analysis of the test indicated that the rejected items were not measures of the first factor measured by the test. There was better than chance agreement between the item analysis and the ratings by teachers or superintendents. Very few items were accepted by the item analysis criterion and rejected by the rating criteria. It was concluded that the best evaluation of the items would include both criteria. (CTM)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Course Objectives.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Criterion Referenced Tests.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Elementary School Mathematics.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Factor Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Goodness of Fit.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Grade 6.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Intermediate Grades.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Item Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Test Interpretation.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Test Items.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Test Validity.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Content Validity
|a Rasch Model
|
| 653 |
0 |
|
|a Mastery (Science Research Associates)
|a South Carolina
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ryan, Joseph P.,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n90703890
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b60814809
|b 211122
|c 081211
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081211
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i dbebd93f-b81c-52bd-9c3f-6e2389b1f12b
|s 2cdca1e0-7c7e-52ba-a5db-56a681f89502
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED185111 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
