|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00003899199 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616174612.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
791101s1979 xx ||| b ||| | eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED189242 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED189242 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Koshiyama, Albert Noboru.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The California Family Choice Initiatives :
|b Implications for Urban Education /
|c Albert Noboru Koshiyama.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1979.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 13 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the National Urban Education Association Conference (Detroit, MI, November, 1979). Not available in paper copy due to light print.
|5 ericd
|
520 |
|
|
|a Three constitutional amendments proposed for the June and November, 1980, ballots in California are discussed in this paper. The amendments, all of which would channel public funds to private schools, are: (1) the "Family Choice Initiative," also known as the Sugarman-Coons proposal, which would permit parents to use public funds to send their children to public or private schools; (2) the "Performance Voucher Plan," or the Hickey-Canfield initiative, which would abolish the public school system and give an annual sum of money to parents for each child's education; and (3) the "Educational Tax Credit Initiative," which would give a State income tax credit to taxpayers who pay public or private educational expenses. Positions in support of and in opposition to the three proposals are reviewed, with consideration given to the effects that each would have on poor, minority, and handicapped students. Also discussed are administrative difficulties that could be encountered in implementing the new funding procedures. (GC)
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Educational Legislation.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Educational Vouchers.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Elementary Secondary Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Financial Support.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Private Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Public Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a School Support.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Tax Credits.
|2 ericd
|
653 |
1 |
|
|a California
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Information Analyses.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b60854789
|b 211122
|c 081211
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081211
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 4
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i b5e5b18c-ce20-5d1a-a9af-9daa6902406f
|s ade5e463-289b-5349-8269-350434b7cabd
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED189242 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|