|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00003909014 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616175446.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
801101s1980 xx ||| b ||| s eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED199265 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED199265 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Lee, Mickey M.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Use of the Semantic Differential Method in Assessing Attitudes and Predicting Final Grades in a Gross Anatomy Course /
|c Mickey M. Lee and Others.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1980.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 20 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, November, 1980).
|5 ericd
|
520 |
|
|
|a Whether a change in dental students' attitudes toward three preselected concepts would occur as a result of a traditionally difficult dental education course as measured by the semantic differential method is determined. This study attempted to determine the predictive value of a student's attitudes in determining his/her final grade. The sample consisted of 89 first year dental students who took a 200 hour gross anatomy class. Instruments consisted of a semantic differential pretest for attitude assessment, an identical posttest, and cummulative midterm and final examinations. Three concepts chosen to assess students' attitudes were: "gross anatomy,""dental education," and "myself." The statistical treatment of the data employed factor analysis, paired t tests, and multiple regression analysis. Results indicated: (1) that students' attitudes toward the anatomy course and themselves did not change significantly, but that a significant negative change did occur in their attitude toward the dental educational experience as a whole; and (2) that students' attitudes toward specific concepts can be successfully employed to predict a portion of their final grade using the semantic differential method. (Author/RL)
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Anatomy.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Attitude Change.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Courses.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Dental Schools.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Grade Prediction.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Higher Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Medical Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Predictive Validity.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Pretests Posttests.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Self Concept.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Semantic Differential.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Statistical Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Student Attitudes.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b61017450
|b 211122
|c 081211
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081211
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 4
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i d84dbb90-6685-567f-a715-8c2f9851bbcb
|s 9f79fa8d-de35-5554-9cce-eb3926e889cb
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED199265 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|