Poverty in the United States : Where Do We Stand Now? / E. Uhr and Elizabeth Evanson.

This report summarizes some of the testimony presented during Congressional hearings in October 1983 to examine the reasons for increased poverty in this country since 1979. Terms used in measuring poverty are defined, and data relating to the amount of poverty that currently exists, who the poor ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uhr, E.
Evanson, Elizabeth (Author)
Corporate Author: Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Inst. for Research on Poverty
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1984.
Subjects:
Genre:
Physical Description:14 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 in00003951384
003 ERIC
005 20220616020845.0
007 he u||024||||
008 840101s1984 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d
035 |a ED242821 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
099 |a ED242821 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Uhr, E. 
245 1 0 |a Poverty in the United States :  |b Where Do We Stand Now? /  |c E. Uhr and Elizabeth Evanson. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1984. 
300 |a 14 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This report summarizes some of the testimony presented during Congressional hearings in October 1983 to examine the reasons for increased poverty in this country since 1979. Terms used in measuring poverty are defined, and data relating to the amount of poverty that currently exists, who the poor are, and how long they remain in poverty are presented. Witnesses at the hearings indicated that the people most likely to be poor were children, blacks, people of Spanish origin, and women--especially women who are heads of single-parent households. Furthermore, testimony revealed that the aged are more insulated from poverty than other groups because they are less vulnerable to swings in the business cycle, and their social insurance benefits are indexed to cost of living increases. Reasons cited for the increase in poverty included declining economic growth, rising unemployment, and lower benefit transfer levels. Eight major options for changes in welfare programs were enumerated by the director of the Congressional Budget Office, but witnesses expressed doubt about the Reagan administration's ability to carry out these goals and bring poverty rates back down to the levels of the mid-1970's, and also called the fairness of the administration's budget cuts into question. (CJM) 
524 |a IRP Focus, v7 n1 p1-13 Win 1984.  |2 ericd 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 0 7 |a Economic Climate.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Federal Aid.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Government Role.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Income.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Inflation (Economics)  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Minority Groups.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Older Adults.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Poverty.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Public Policy.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Unemployment Insurance.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Welfare Services.  |2 ericd 
653 0 |a Aid to Families with Dependent Children  |a Medicare 
655 7 |a Reports, General.  |2 ericd 
655 7 |a Journal Articles.  |2 ericd 
700 1 |a Evanson, Elizabeth,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n00111632 
710 2 |a Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Inst. for Research on Poverty. 
907 |y .b61601809  |b 211122  |c 081212 
998 |a mc  |b 081212  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i 83474f7d-6ca8-5c43-a018-58d72dcfd9bd  |s d1ed5204-4ad6-589d-9157-017f9efcaa2f  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED242821 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1