|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00003983294 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616023924.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
780101s1978 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED275185 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED275185 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Norrman, Ralf.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n77010816
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a On the Degree of Motivation in Signs Used in Metaphors Involving Plant Symbolism /
|c Ralf Norrman.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1978.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 23 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: In: Ostman, Jan-Ola, edition Cohesion and Semantics. Reports on Text Linguistics, see FL 016 125.
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Examples cited refute a generally accepted view that the origins of metaphors are arbitrary. To illustrate this point, examples are cited of how products of nature (curcubitic plants: melons, pumpkins) are used as references to people and their characteristics (hardiness, appearance, texture, inertness, reproductive and sexual connotations). In various contexts these comparisons express similarity and differences, two principles upon which metaphors typically develop. The frequent occurrences of plant metaphors suggest that nature, or reinforcement through nature, has played the larger role in the metaphors' survival. Accordingly, curcubitic symbolism has tended not to exist or to survive in parts of the world in which the plants do not occur. Thus the capability of users of the symbol to grasp its meaning depends on both the tradition of the sign and the user's knowledge of curcubitic plants. (MSE)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Diachronic Linguistics.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Figurative Language.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Linguistic Theory.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Metaphors.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Semiotics.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Symbolic Language.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Symbols (Literary)
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
0 |
|
|a Plants (Botany)
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Evaluative.
|2 ericd
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b62082498
|b 211122
|c 081214
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081214
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 3fedb8c1-4852-5846-8ddb-cc045b366659
|s b946c6eb-8039-5375-85a4-4fa988ab3255
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED275185 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
