|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00003988176 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616024406.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
860410s1986 xx ||| b ||| s eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED280152 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED280152 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Venters, Tommy R.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Effect of Statewide Reassessment and Millage Rollback on School Finance in Arkansas /
|c Tommy R. Venters and Martin W. Schoppmeyer.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1986.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 18 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Education Finance Association (Chicago, IL, April 1986).
|5 ericd
|
520 |
|
|
|a Amendment 59 to the Arkansas Constitution established three kinds of taxable property (real, personal, and utility) and prescribed different reassessment and millage rollbacks for each. This has led to a lack of revenue growth from any source except real property. Because more funds are needed to implement new state standards in the schools, 12 solutions have been suggested for changing the effect of the rollback on personal and utility property. Some of these suggestions are to (1) repeal Amendment 59; (2) classify property; (3) classify property, but remove household goods from tax rolls; (4) create a scheduled reduction in personal property millage; (5) combine real and personal property millages in each school district on the same ratio that exists between real and personal property; and (6) classify both utility and carrier personal property as personal property. Most suggestions would require another constitutional amendment. The most viable solution is to let the provisions of the law take effect and provide new revenue to make up the lack of funds. Other states should: (1) avoid temporary classification of property, if possible; and (2) avoid making a complex rollback plan part of the state constitution. Advantages and disadvantages of each suggestion are listed. (IW)
|
521 |
8 |
|
|a Researchers.
|b ericd
|
521 |
8 |
|
|a Policymakers.
|b ericd
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Assessed Valuation.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Change Strategies.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Constitutional Law.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Educational Equity (Finance)
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Educational Finance.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Elementary Secondary Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Finance Reform.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Financial Problems.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Problems.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Property Appraisal.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Property Taxes.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a State Legislation.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Tax Rates.
|2 ericd
|
653 |
1 |
|
|a Arkansas
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Descriptive.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Opinion Papers.
|2 ericd
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Schoppmeyer, Martin W.,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82224115
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b6213131x
|b 211122
|c 081214
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081214
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 4
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i 3e3d59cc-e04f-5f5b-9904-6f01c9993b2c
|s 07881143-4a6a-5c77-b5e9-681e36abcb35
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED280152 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|