|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002u 4500 |
001 |
in00004014562 |
003 |
ERIC |
005 |
20220616030925.0 |
007 |
he u||024|||| |
008 |
890322s1989 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
035 |
|
|
|a ED307118 Microfiche
|
040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
099 |
|
|
|a ED307118 Microfiche
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Brown, David E.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n98108243
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Overcoming Misconceptions via Analogical Reasoning :
|b Factors Influencing Understanding in a Teaching Experiment /
|c David E. Brown and John Clement.
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1989.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 33 pages
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
|5 ericd
|
500 |
|
|
|a Contract Number: MDR-8751391.
|5 ericd
|
500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, March 27-31, 1989). Contains small print and drawings which may not reproduce well.
|5 ericd
|
520 |
|
|
|a In most research that investigates factors influencing the success of analogies in instruction, an underlying assumption is that students have little or no knowledge of the target situation. It is interesting to ask what factors influence the success of analogies when students believe they understand the target situation. If this understanding is not normative, instruction must aim at conceptual change rather than simply conceptual growth. Through the analysis of four case studies of tutoring interviews, a preliminary list of factors important for success in overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning is proposed. First, there must be a usable anchoring conception. Second, the analogical connection between an anchoring example and the target situation may need to be developed explicitly through processes such as the use of intermediate analogies. Third, it may be necessary to engage the student in a process of analogical reasoning in an interactive teaching environment, rather than simply presenting the analogy in a text or lecture. Finally, the result of this process may need to be the student's construction of a new explanatory model of the target situation. (YP)
|
521 |
8 |
|
|a Researchers.
|b ericd
|
533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Analogy.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Case Studies.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Concept Formation.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Force.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Interviews.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Mechanics (Physics)
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Misconceptions.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Physics.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Science Instruction.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Secondary Education.
|2 ericd
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Secondary School Science.
|2 ericd
|
653 |
0 |
|
|a Science Education Research
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Research.
|2 ericd
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Clement, John,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005004125
|
907 |
|
|
|y .b62488703
|b 211123
|c 081215
|
998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081215
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
999 |
f |
f |
|i 2bc250da-3d96-5ecf-8711-5e57685b5bf4
|s 0727001c-9c39-59c4-b881-893bc342601b
|t 0
|
952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED307118 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|