|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00004027173 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616032142.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
900301s1990 xx ||| b ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED318066 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED318066 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Brown, Stuart C.,
|d 1938-
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50039681
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Value in the New Rhetoric :
|b I. A. Richards and the Necessity of "Ethos." /
|c Stuart C. Brown.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1990.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 15 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (41st, Chicago, IL, March 22-24, 1990).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In much current literary and rhetorical theory, analysis of text assumes greater authority than the text and its creator. Through a reexamination of the ancient Greeks' notion of "ethos" (the residue of the writer or speaker in the text), the writer, reader, and text can be reunited, particularly in light of the theory of meanings proposed by I. A. Richards. Richards asserted that self can be discovered through a discovery of meaning. To Richards, the text, as the work of the writer or speaker, cannot be ignored by the reader or listener, who is to derive approximate meaning. Arriving at meaning is an investigation into the psychology of the reader, the text, and the writer. The writer's character, as reflected by the text, meets the character of the reader through the mediation of the text. To Richards, language may be the only means by which human development can continue. Closer examination of the ethos of both writer and reader leads each to a greater understanding of the other and the other's misunderstandings. (Five notes are included; 23 references are attached.) (SG)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Communication (Thought Transfer)
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Hermeneutics.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Language Role.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Mediation Theory.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Persuasive Discourse.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Reader Text Relationship.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Rhetorical Criticism.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Self Actualization.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Literary Theory
|a Richards (I A)
|
| 653 |
0 |
|
|a Aristotle
|a Author Text Relationship
|a Dialectic (Concept)
|a Ethos
|a Plato of Athens
|a Textual Analysis
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Opinion Papers.
|2 ericd
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Information Analyses.
|2 ericd
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b6272566x
|b 211123
|c 081216
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081216
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i b5d66810-c994-5ed2-8781-835908f13e68
|s 7e55763a-d588-56e5-9013-d41eba11e1b3
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED318066 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
