Rethinking Punctuation / John Dawkins.

Many of the best nonfiction writers violate punctuation rules frequently enough to indicate that the rules neither tell very well what to do nor inform very accurately about what is done. An examination of 18 prominent authors' use of the entire hierarchy of punctuation marks shows disagreement and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dawkins, John
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1991.
Subjects:
Genre:
Physical Description:53 pages
Format: Microfilm Book

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 in00004049061
003 ERIC
005 20220616034307.0
007 he u||024||||
008 910101s1991 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d
035 |a ED340048 Microfiche 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI  |d UtOrBLW 
049 0 0 |a EEM# 
099 |a ED340048 Microfiche 
100 1 |a Dawkins, John.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86101831 
245 1 0 |a Rethinking Punctuation /  |c John Dawkins. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1991. 
300 |a 53 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Many of the best nonfiction writers violate punctuation rules frequently enough to indicate that the rules neither tell very well what to do nor inform very accurately about what is done. An examination of 18 prominent authors' use of the entire hierarchy of punctuation marks shows disagreement and inconsistency among the writers concerning application of rules. Analysis of the writers' works: (1) explains the differences among skilled writers as reasoned principle-based behavior; (2) produces a set of four principles that guide punctuation use; and (3) suggests that punctuation usage should be guided by principles of style, rather than rules that demand strict compliance. Teachers should encourage students to think of punctuation not as a matter of right and wrong, but in terms of stylistic concerns. Punctuation usage should be considered in terms of clarity, appropriateness, effectiveness, and taste. The "principle" approach is positive, while the "rule" approach is negative. In addition, the rule approach is intimidating for students, while the principle approach is easier to learn and less threatening. (Two tables, 122 examples, and 10 endnotes are included.) (SG) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
500 |a Microform. 
650 1 7 |a Authors.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Educational Philosophy.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Grammar.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Nonfiction.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Punctuation.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Student Relationship.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Writing Improvement.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Writing Instruction.  |2 ericd 
653 1 |a Principles Approach  |a Rule Learning 
653 0 |a Stylistics  |a Writing Models 
655 7 |a Reports, Evaluative.  |2 ericd 
907 |y .b63033525  |b 211123  |c 081217 
998 |a mc  |b 081217  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
982 |a no_backstage 
999 f f |i ec8fdfd9-300e-5701-bdaf-6fdd1e72bbe6  |s 60354a6e-d8c2-5022-85db-8e92a111a081  |t 0 
952 f f |p Non-Circulating  |a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan  |b Michigan State University  |c MSU Microforms  |d MSU Microforms, 2 West  |t 0  |e ED340048 Microfiche  |h Other scheme  |i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)  |n 1