|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000002u 4500 |
| 001 |
in00004114132 |
| 003 |
ERIC |
| 005 |
20220616044632.0 |
| 007 |
he u||024|||| |
| 008 |
970301s1997 xx ||| bt ||| | eng d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a ED409364 Microfiche
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a ericd
|c ericd
|d MvI
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 049 |
0 |
0 |
|a EEM#
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a ED409364 Microfiche
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Schnipke, Deborah L.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no99029785
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Assessing Subgroup Differences in Item Response Times /
|c Deborah L. Schnipke and Peter J. Pashley.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a [Place of publication not identified] :
|b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
|c 1997.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 19 pages
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a microform
|b h
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a microfiche
|b he
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24-28, 1997).
|5 ericd
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Differences in test performance on time-limited tests may be due in part to differential response-time rates between subgroups, rather than real differences in the knowledge, skills, or developed abilities of interest. With computer-administered tests, response times are available and may be used to address this issue. This study investigates procedures for identifying possible subgroup differences in response times from a computer-administered test. Based on the results, it appears that survival analysis methodology is useful for uncovering subgroup differences in response time rates. Data from a national high-stakes computer-administered (but not adaptive) reasoning test were used. Data from 6,306 test takers who said that English was their best language and 462 test takers who said that English was not their best language were analyzed with parametric (Cox regression) and nonparametric (Wilcoxon test) approaches. Significant differences between response times across the two subgroups were found, although this does not necessarily imply that particular items should have been identified as having differential item functioning. (Contains 3 tables, 3 figures, and 11 references.) (Author/SLD)
|
| 533 |
|
|
|a Microfiche.
|b [Washington D.C.]:
|c ERIC Clearinghouse
|e microfiches : positive.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Microform.
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Computer Assisted Testing.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Data Analysis.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a English.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a High Stakes Tests.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Item Bias.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Language Dominance.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Performance Factors.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Regression (Statistics)
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Research Methodology.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Responses.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
0 |
7 |
|a Test Items.
|2 ericd
|
| 650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Timed Tests.
|2 ericd
|
| 653 |
1 |
|
|a Subgroups
|a Survival Analysis
|
| 653 |
0 |
|
|a Item Bias Detection
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Reports, Evaluative.
|2 ericd
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Speeches/Meeting Papers.
|2 ericd
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Pashley, Peter J.,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n91113714
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b64440059
|b 211123
|c 081225
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a mc
|b 081225
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g xx
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 982 |
|
|
|a no_backstage
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 9b926360-9f07-5c77-9816-7219297e3988
|s 36bf73d4-e8d1-5653-91c3-f886868f588e
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Non-Circulating
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Microforms
|d MSU Microforms, 2 West
|t 0
|e ED409364 Microfiche
|h Other scheme
|i Microform (Microfilm/Microfiche)
|n 1
|
