|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
in00005566228 |
| 003 |
OCoLC |
| 005 |
20220616143901.0 |
| 008 |
160512t20162016mau b 001 0 eng c |
| 010 |
|
|
|a 2016015023
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780674971448
|q hardcover
|q alkaline paper
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0674971442
|q hardcover
|q alkaline paper
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)946975321
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a MH/DLC
|b eng
|e rda
|c HLS
|d DLC
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCO
|d BDX
|d OCLCF
|d HLS
|d YDX
|d OCLCO
|d EVK
|d UtOrBLW
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a pcc
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a EVKA
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a KF5425
|b .V47 2016
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Vermeule, Adrian,
|d 1968-
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002023505
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Law's abnegation :
|b from law's empire to the administrative state /
|c Adrian Vermeule.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Cambridge, Massachusetts :
|b Harvard University Press,
|c 2016.
|
| 264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2016
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 254 pages ;
|c 25 cm
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a unmediated
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a volume
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- The legality of administrative law -- Separation of powers without idolatry -- Deference and due process -- Rationally arbitrary decisions -- Thin rationality review -- Appendix to Chapter 5 -- How law empowers nonlawyers -- Conclusion : Law on the margin.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a "Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In area after area, judges and lawyers, working out the logical implications of legal principles, have come to believe that administrators should be granted broad leeway to set policy, determine facts, interpret ambiguous statutes, and even define the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. Agencies have greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront many issues than lawyers and judges do. And as the questions confronting the state involving climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology (to name a few) have become ever more complex, legal logic increasingly indicates that abnegation is the wisest course of action"--
|c Provided by publisher.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Judicial review of administrative acts
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008106231
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Administrative discretion
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85000911
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Administrative agencies
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007100596
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Administrative law
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007100599
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Administrative procedure
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007100597
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Rule of law
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008111043
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Administrative agencies.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00796723
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Administrative discretion.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00796839
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Administrative law.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00796846
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Administrative procedure.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00796890
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Judicial review of administrative acts.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00984732
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Rule of law.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01101218
|
| 651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
| 907 |
|
|
|y .b119281375
|b 190426
|c 160608
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a dx
|b 161128
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g mau
|h 0
|i 2
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a C0
|b EVK
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i ba1654ce-c7d8-5fea-ae3d-0506a355608f
|s 04a79929-74d0-57e2-8549-c375700e0d06
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Can Circulate
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Schaefer Law Library
|d MSU Schaefer Law Library - Level 1
|t 0
|e KF5425 .V47 2016
|h Library of Congress classification
|i Printed Material
|m 35157002514138
|n 1
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Can Circulate
|a Michigan State University-Library of Michigan
|b Michigan State University
|c MSU Schaefer Law Library
|d MSU Schaefer Law Library - Level 1
|t 0
|e KF5425 .V47 2016
|h Library of Congress classification
|i Printed Material
|m 35157002576483
|n 2
|
