Eliminate Corporate Subsidies : A Debate / Intelligence2.
Agriculture, the auto industry, and the energy sector all benefit from government subsidies in the form of loans, tax breaks, and other preferences. Critics of these subsidies argue that they are misguided and unfair, transferring wealth from taxpayers to corporations and distorting the nation's mar...
| Uniform Title: | Films on Demand.
|
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | |
| Language: | English |
| Language of the Original: |
English |
| Language and/or Writing System: |
Closed-captioned. |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
Intelligence2,
[2016]
|
| Series: | Films on Demand.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Genre: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (1 video file (1 hr., 38 min., 31 sec.)) : sound, color. |
| Format: | Electronic Video |
Contents:
- Introduction: Eliminate Corporate Subsidies (4:15)
- Debate "Housekeeping" (5:49)
- For the Motion: Jack Abramoff (7:18)
- Against the Motion: Michael Lind (6:59)
- For the Motion: Zephyr Teachout (7:36)
- Against the Motion: Kate Gordon (7:33)
- Inevitability of Corruption (6:26)
- Corruption: Agencies vs. Government (5:08)
- Removing Corruption (2:50)
- Renewable Energy Subsidies (4:03)
- Subsidies and the Constitution (1:20)
- QA: Government Identification of Subsidies (6:05)
- QA: Optimal Return on Corruption (2:36)
- QA: Sunset Subsidies (1:55)
- QA: Savings from Subsidies (3:34)
- QA: Technology-Based Subsidies vs. Competition-Based Subsidies (4:03)
- QA: International Competition (2:35)
- QA: Affording Subsidies (2:01)
- Subsidies Selection (2:15)
- Concluding Statement For: Zephyr Teachout (2:41)
- Concluding Statement Against: Michael Lind (1:47)
- Concluding Statement For: Jack Abramoff (2:10)
- Concluding Statement Against: Kate Gordon (1:14)
- Time to Vote (4:17)
- Audience Vote Results (1:03)
- Credits: Eliminate Corporate Subsidies: A Debate (0:49)