Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks [electronic resource] : 2013 letter report / Committee to Review NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks, Board on Health Sciences Policy ; Carol E.H. Scott-Conner, Daniel R. Masys, Catharyn T. Liverman, and Margaret A. McCoy, editors ; Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.

"Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report is the first in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee to Review NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks (Author)
Institute of Medicine (U.S.) (Publisher)
Other Authors: Scott-Conner, Carol E. H. (Editor)
Masys, Daniel (Editor)
Liverman, Catharyn T. (Editor)
McCoy, Margaret A. (Editor)
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press, [2014]
Subjects:
Online Access:
Variant Title:
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report
Format: Electronic eBook
Description
Summary:
"Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report is the first in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews three evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report."--Publisher's description.
Bibliography Note:Includes bibliographical references (pages 35-40).
ISBN:9780309296533 (online)
9780309296557 (online)
9780309296564 (online)